On Equality, Sexism and an Even Hand
Here's the offending image that kicked it all off:
My opinion here is just give it up already. A joke like that is not sexism. We are all (mostly) adults here. We don't need to throw a hissy-fit every time someone makes a joke. We shouldn't assume (as many people did) that just because there are two attractive women wearing a shirt that has a double-entendre on it, that they are models hired to promote the product. Even some of the prominent women in this industry have claimed it (some of them are women that I have a HUGE deal of respect for).
To me, this entire thing shows how sexist the community is. Not because some company saw fit to make T-Shirts sporting a sexually charged slogan (which really wasn't overtly sexual). But because of the outrage it caused.
Face it, sex is a part of life. The more we try to oppress it and hide it, the more it creates a gap between men and women. It's a part of our culture. If it makes someone uncomfortable (due to religious or any other reason), then that person should remove themselves from that situation. If this T-Shirt offends you, then don't go to the booth and get one.
I am offended, partially because I feel it shows a complete lack of respect for me and my time. What do I do when I am offended in these cases? Do I flip out and name names? No. I find a way out of the situation, and I move to a better one. That's it. If you're offended or uncomfortable with something, then leave. That's normal.
OFFENDING SOMEONE IS NOT THE SAME AS BEING OFFENSIVE...
Being offensive is where the majority of a community would be offended (even the non-vocal ones) and it was intentionally designed to offend or put down people. Just because you were offended doesn't mean that something was offensive.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think it's a good thing at all if people are offended or slighted or whatever at conferences. I do think effort needs to be made to make it more welcoming and easier for everyone to get along. However, I don't think rules against anything that may offend people will help (the opposite actually). I also don't think that getting up in arms over something minor like a double-entendre on a T-Shirt does anyone any good. All it does is dilute the real problems...
There's a perfect parallel in the US: Freedom of Speech. In the US, you are free to talk about just about anything you want. You can share your opinions irrespective of if others will find them offensive. However, what's not legal is hate speech and harassment. It's often a subjective and fine line between them (and it is very context sensitive), but the point is that there is a distinction between something that offends someone else, and being deliberately offensive / harassing.
COME ON, be real. Women have a tough time getting into technology for one reason: That we treat them differently (and by we, I include everyone, including women). Sure, there are assholes out there that try to put women down, and make it harder for them (for whatever reason). But guess what? There are also assholes out there that try to put PHP developers down because it's not Ruby or whatever language of fancy (names aside)...
Now I'm not trying to trivialize what women go through in this industry. Instead, what I'm trying to point out is that women are not special. They do not need to be protected. They do not need to be singled out. That's sexism. Even having a group (such as PHP Women) actually partially deepens the gap by forcing a divide between men and women in the industry.
Unfortunately it's a double-edged sword. Targeting women (for encouragement or discouragement, both are just as guilty) implies that they need help. It implies that it's a tough world out there and they need hand holding to get through it. It re-enforces the concept that they couldn't do it themselves without a team of help. But on the other hand, it is a tough world out there. Having a group that can provide support is necessary to make it easier for women to get into tech.
Female developers are the same as male developers. They are developers. The second that you think they need to be protected is the same second that they become different enough to need protection (because you made it so). People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones...
Now, if someone is being personally (or impersonally) harassed, the person doing the harassment needs to be dealt with. Notice that I said someone. Not a woman. Not a "protected category". But anyone. We shouldn't tolerate harassment targeted ANYONE. The recent blow up of women coming forward admitting that they have been harassed at conferences is sad. Not because they are women. But because harassment is happening. The fact that they are women should never enter into the picture. Harassment is harassment, end of story...
As far as the T-Shirt at hand, it's not harassment. It's not a shirt that I would wear in a professional context (to my office), but at the same time I would have no problem wearing it to my parent's house. This blow up in the community and the amount of fury flowing around on both sides sickens me... If you don't like it, fine. If you are offended by it, fine. But to publicly berate it is another thing.
Instead, let's deal with our problems like adults. Let's not treat women differently. Let's simply treat all developers as developers. It's a hard enough game as it is without making conscious or unconscious distinctions between players. The only people that are hurt by distinctions are everyone...
So can we get over it already? Let's get past this childish finger pointing, and focus on getting shit done. And when real problems happen, and when someone is being harassed, then come out guns blazing to protect the community. But until that happens, let's just relax and grow up.Signed,
Edit: I have received some feedback about the remark that I made about PHP Women above. I'd like to clarify that a bit. I think the PHP Women group is outstanding, and I'm a huge supporter of it. They do a fantastic job all around. And they do help men as well. However, my point (which I still do believe) is that such a group will always create a partial divide in the community, from the simple position that it creates a distinction that "women have a group, but men don't" or whatever. In an ideal world, such a group wouldn't need to exist. But we aren't in an ideal world, so the group does far more good than bad (FAR more).